External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center.

نویسندگان

  • Guy J Ben Simon
  • Jeffrey Joseph
  • Seongmu Lee
  • Robert M Schwarcz
  • John D McCann
  • Robert A Goldberg
چکیده

PURPOSE To compare success rates of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and endoscopic endonasal DCR for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). DESIGN Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty-three patients (176 surgeries) operated for acquired NLDO. METHODS A review of electronic medical records of patients with acquired NLDO who underwent DCR at the Jules Stein Eye Institute from 1999 to 2004 was performed. Data regarding the lacrimal drainage system, comprehensive eye examination, surgical outcome, and postoperative nasal endoscopy were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Surgery failure was defined as (1) no marked improvement in tearing or any episode of postoperative dacryocystitis, (2) inability to irrigate the lacrimal system postoperatively, and (3) postoperative nasal endoscopy with scarring in the intranasal osteotomy or no visualization of fluorescein dye. Postoperative nasal endoscopy was performed in all failed cases and in >50% of all patients. RESULTS One hundred forty-three patients (48 male and 95 female; mean age, 63 years) underwent 176 DCR surgeries for acquired NLDO. Success was achieved in 135 cases (76.7%), and failure in 41 (23.3%). Of the 41 failed cases, anatomical obstruction at the fistula site was found in 20 (49% of failed cases), whereas functional failure with no evidence of obstruction was found in 21 (51%). Surgery revision was performed in 22 cases (12.5%), but it was successful in only 9 (5.1%); patients who failed the first revision were likely to fail additional revisions (P = 0.02). History of facial trauma was associated with surgery failure. In our patients, endoscopic DCR (86 cases) had a significantly higher success rate than external DCR (90 cases), 84% versus 70% (P = 0.03). Complications included 1 patient with nose bleeding on the first postoperative day that resolved with nasal packing and 2 patients with sump syndrome that resolved after endoscopic revision. CONCLUSIONS The success rate of DCR for acquired NLDO in our group of patients was 77%, lower than reported in previous studies, with endoscopic surgery showing better results. Success rates of revision surgery were relatively low (<50%), and patients who fail the first revision are not likely to benefit from additional revisions.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external

Aims and Objectives: To compare the success rates of non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy for the surgical management of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Materials and methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional case series of 302 patients who underwent either endonasal or external dacryocystorhinos...

متن کامل

A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction

PURPOSE To compare success rates of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and endoscopic endonasal DCR for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). DESIGN Historical cohort study. PARTICIPANTS 100 patients who underwent external DCR and 105 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal DCR. METHODS A retrospective review of medical records of patients with acquired NLDO who underwent D...

متن کامل

Facial asymmetry and nasal septal deviation in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

INTRODUCTION Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a common disorder affecting adults. Its pathogenesis is not known. We hypothesize that facial and bony asymmetry can contribute to the unilaterality of the nasolacrimal duct obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study was done on all patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction who presented to our practice from January...

متن کامل

Is an endoscopic approach superior to external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal obstruction?

BACKGROUND Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is caused by a variety of acquired and congenital etiologies. The standard treatment is dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), with the gold standard being the external DCR. Since the advent of the nasal endoscope, the transnasal endoscopic DCR has gained popularity and has several advantages over the external approach. Some potential advantages include the avoida...

متن کامل

Outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in the management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

INTRODUCTION Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the treatment of choice for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Although external DCR is regarded as the gold standard, endoscopic DCR is evolving as an equally-effective alternative. Objectives To compare the success rate of treating nasolacrimal duct obstruction by endoscopic endonasal method compared to the conventional DCR surgery. Materials and method...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Ophthalmology

دوره 112 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005